HACKING SPEECH: INFORMATIONAL SPEECH AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT - {Dubstowel}

Abstract:
The Supreme Court has never articulated the extent of First Amendment protection for instructional or "informational" speech--factual speech that may be repurposed for crime. As technology advances and traditional modes of speech become intertwined with code speech, crafting a doctrine that expressly addresses the First Amendment limits of protection for informational speech becomes pressing. Using the case study of "vulnerability speech"--speech that identifies a potentially critical flaw in a technological system but may indirectly facilitate criminality--this Article proposes a four-part "repurposed speech scale" for crafting the outer boundaries of First Amendment protection for informational speech. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

How to Cite:
APA:
Matwyshyn, A. M. (2013). HACKING SPEECH: INFORMATIONAL SPEECH AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT. Northwestern University Law Review, 107(2), 795-845.
AMA:
Matwyshyn A. HACKING SPEECH: INFORMATIONAL SPEECH AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT. Northwestern University Law Review [serial online]. Winter2013 2013;107(2):795-845. Available from: Academic Search Complete, Ipswich, MA. Accessed November 15, 2015.
Harvard:
Matwyshyn, AM 2013, 'HACKING SPEECH: INFORMATIONAL SPEECH AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT', Northwestern University Law Review, 107, 2, pp. 795-845, Academic Search Complete, EBSCOhost, viewed 15 November 2015.