George R R Martins A Game Of Thrones 20 (c2c) (2014) (Empire-Adventurers) cbr (- Nem -)

seeders: 27
leechers: 14
Added on June 17, 2014 by Nemesis43in Books > Comics
Torrent verified.



George R R Martins A Game Of Thrones 20 (c2c) (2014) (Empire-Adventurers) cbr (- Nem -) (Size: 100.72 MB)
 George_R.R._Martins_A_Game_Of_Thrones_20_(c2c)_(2014)_(Empire-Adventurers).cbr100.72 MB


Description


All my uploads can be viewed/read using CDisplayEx (link below) or similar comic viewing App. Please seed.If reseed needed - message me.
Feel free to message me with any requests or questions you may have.

Torrent: CDisplayEx Windows x32 and x64 v1.10.14

Torrent: ComicRackSetup09154 exe

Or for your Android device try ComicRack v1.79

Torrent: ComicRack v1.79

When messaging with requests please take a minute to check the 'What`s Been Scanned Master List' - it`s a very useful resource - here`s a link -

Torrent: The What's Scanned Master List (thru 2014.02|posted 2014.05.08)

Sharing Widget


Download torrent
100.72 MB
seeders:27
leechers:14
George R R Martins A Game Of Thrones 20 (c2c) (2014) (Empire-Adventurers) cbr (- Nem -)

All Comments

Thanks.
Thanks
You're plain wrong, as far as I can discern. If you actually look at the Adventurers and GreenMan releases at magnification, instead of making the pardonable assumption that bigger must be better, it's quite obvious that that assumption is wrong in this case.

I'm too clueless to be able to tell exactly what the underlying reasons may be (better paper copy, better scanner, better software, or simply better know-how), but the GreenMan scan clearly has the higher definition of the two, as well as the nicer palette, and if there are any compression artifacts, I sure can't spot them. The Adventurers release gives us for the inflated filesize is a pristine encoding of a mediocre original, which is kinda pointless and has nothing to do with "HD". And if you were to re-compress that one to the same size as the GreenMan version, you'd find that the quality doesn't noticably suffer, which is pretty much the definition of being undercompressed.

Assumptions are blind; it's for you to use your own eyes! :)

---

ETA: Actually, what am I doing using a thousand words where two pictures would do a much more convincing job - BRB.
Sorry, took a bit longer than I anticipated, but this makes the case quite nicely, I daresay:

Bigger is better... except when it isn't: A Case Study