No Retreat, No Surrender 1986 (Van Damme) BDRip 720p DD 2.0-HighCodeseeders: 20
leechers: 18
No Retreat, No Surrender 1986 (Van Damme) BDRip 720p DD 2.0-HighCode (Size: 8.47 GB)
Description
No Retreat, No Surrender 1986 (Van Damme) BDRip 720p DD 2.0-HighCode Action | Crime | Drama Jason Stillwell, a Bruce Lee fan, is beaten numerous times and trains from the ghost of Lee. Jason then must use his newly acquired skills to save Seattle from a crime syndicate, whose top martial artist is the deadly Ivan. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0089695/ Source--------- AUS BD / AVC @25 Mbps Released------ 2015/01/05 Format--------- mkv/avc File size-------- 8.46 GB Length--------- 1:38:49 Video Bit rate ~11.9 Mbps Resolution---- 1280x720 Frame rate---- 24 fps Audio----------- Eng DD 2.0 @384 Kbps Subtitles------ Cze, Dan, Fin, Hun, Pol, Pt br, Rom, Spa, Swe Encoder------- HighCode BD vs BDRip       More 720p Van Damme's: Bloodsport 1988 (Van Damme) BDRip 720p DD 2.0 multisub-HighCode Cyborg 1989 (Van Damme) BDRip 720p DD 2.0-HighCode Kickboxer 1989 (Van Damme) BDRip 720p DTS 5.1-HighCode Lionheart 1990 (Van Damme) BDRip 720p DD 2.0-HighCode Double Impact 1991 (Van Damme) BDRip 720p DD 2.0-HighCode Hard Target 1993 (Van Damme) BDRip 720p DTS 5.1-HighCode Street Fighter 1994 (Van Damme) BDRip 720p DTS-HighCode Timecop 1994 (Van Damme) BDRip 720p DTS 5.1-HighCode Sudden Death 1995 (Van Damme) BDRip 720p DTS-HighCode The Quest 1996 (Van Damme) BDRip 720p DTS-HighCode ...more to come Sharing WidgetTrailerAll Comments |
Is large but it is the best around the world.
you're such noob, I see you never encoded/tested samples in your life.
Show me screens from any 1080p encode or even full BD-s, I'll post then screens from this encode. You can then download to pc and watch both screens full screens on your huge TV monitor.
I already posted comparison screens between BD and encode, I see you didn't bother to check them. On my 55" calibrated led TV I see NULL difference between encode & BD. PROVE, not just open your stupid gob, arsehole. I read some of your hilarious non-sense comments, your knowledge about p2p, scene releases, encoding, quality etc is equal with the knowledge of a chicken.
I did not say your encode isn't good, I just said the bitrate you chose to use was unnecessary, it's a placebo effect at that level. I believe it would have looked just as nice at half of that bitrate.
But, as you say, I'm not the one encoding these files so I don't make the decisions. Beggars can't be choosers, right?